Lin Dan was signed on loan by Qingdao Hezhan Renzhou Badminton Club only for the playoff after the league this year with the top standard of 1.5 million yuan (about 245,000 U.S. dollar) since June 3.
However Cheap Air Jordan 13 Retro For Sale , "Super Dan" was informed that he could not participate in the playoff due to the conflict between the sponsor of Lin and the league on Saturday before the first match of the semifinal.
The commercial conflict was mainly due to the brand on the clothes. General method to tackle the problem was to cover the brand on the clothes but the relevant parties of the League did not reach an agreement.
Lin was banned again off the second match of the semifinal on Monday. He expressed some dissatisfaction on Chinese Twitter-like Weibo. "It could be coordinated in the international games. Why it did not work in Chinese League?"
Without "Super Dan", his club still won the semifinal. And Lin will play in an exhibition match as a compensation for the audience in Qingdao Cheap Air Jordan 12 Retro For Sale , said the club.
LHASA, Sept. 5 (Xinhua) -- The 11th Panchen Lama Bainqen Erdini Qoigyijabu returned to Lhasa Monday after touring Qamdo in southwestern Tibet Autonomous Region.
This was the first time the Panchen Lama has visited the region since his enthronement 22 years ago.
He arrived in Qamdo on Aug. 29 and the next day visited Champa Ling Monastery Cheap Air Jordan 11 Retro For Sale , the largest monastery of Gelug Sect with 1,054 monks.
During his tour Cheap Air Jordan 10 Retro For Sale , the Panchen Lama, who is also vice president of the Buddhist Association of China and a member of the Standing Committee of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference Cheap Womens Air Jordan 1 Retro For Sale , also visited several villages, factories and Qamdo Economic Development Zone. He spoke to local residents Cheap Womens Jordan 1 Retro For Sale , representatives from all walks of life and offered blessings to followers.
Xi meets journalists as BRICS summit concludes
Xi addresses Dialogue of Emerging Market and Developing Countries
Xi tells Modi healthy, stable China-India ties needed
China to advance comprehensive strategic partnership with Egypt
Autumn scenery of Hunhe River in N China's Hohhot
Villagers air harvests in south China
Dew drops seen on plant leaves in east China
Fish Dish Festival celebrated in C China's Hunan
by Xinhua Writer Zhu Dongyang
BEIJING, Aug. 9 (Xinhua) -- U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Tuesday played the China-bashing card once again in his latest attempt to rectify his falling popularity. The inflammatory rhetoric, however, is dangerous and damaging and offers nothing substantive in way of improving relations with China.
In a speech in Detroit that outlined his economic prescription for America's economic headaches, Trump alleged that China "breaks the rules in every way imaginable" when trading with the United States, and "is responsible for nearly half of our entire trade deficit."
The former property developer pledged to boost the U.S. economy by hindering China's exports to the U.S. market and renegotiating global trade rules. "Americanism not globalism will be our new credo," Trump claimed.
To make their boss more appealing to the blue-collar working class in Midwestern states, economic advisers of the New York mogul earlier threatened a tougher approach on trade that includes a possible "trade war" with China, the world's second largest economy and the U.S.'s largest trading partner.
By scapegoating China and global free trade for lackluster economic performance, Trump and his team betrayed the Republicans' traditional endorsement of unrestricted trade. In a freakish coincidence, Trump shared a similar view with his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton that Washington shall pursue myopic and poisonous protectionism and "stand up to China" to make up for lost ground.
For years, China-bashing has always been an easy card for U.S. political candidates to play and cover up the country' s fundamental structural drawbacks. After all, settling these problems needs more painstaking reforms that none of the two parties would dare propose at the risk of electoral defeat.
However, if populist yet protectionist policies gets its way, Americans would have to pay a much higher price to bring factory jobs back to the country. By failing to focus on some real competitive edges, such means will only prompt countermeasures from other nations, leading to tit-for-tat protectionism and even trade wars, in the worst scenario.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, traditionally a Republican's supporter on trade, said that Trump's approach would cost 3.5 million U.S. jobs and result in higher prices for American consumers as well as a weaker economy.